我是你屁股永遠的痛 Be the pain in your ass forever 3 -最新"乾爽"指考模擬試題-

受到新舊版歷史課本啟發，讓我忍不住查閱更多歷史資料，在此出題苦中作樂：

一、閱讀測驗：（請先閱讀一段文字，並依據文字提供線索選擇最有可能的答案）

1. 2012年（民國101年）初，舉行第十三任總統、副總統大選，國民黨馬英九、吳敦義（1948年～）擊退民進黨、親民黨的候選人，順利當選，選舉過程較之前的總統大選理性，台灣民主政治更臻成熟。

　請問這本教科書的編輯最有可能來自哪一個黨派？
A. 國民黨
B. 民進黨
C. 親民黨
D. 中國共產黨

　本文所指＂選舉過程較之前的總統大選理性＂與＂台灣民主政治更臻成熟＂的表現可能包含？
A. 人民直選，而不像前八屆投票者僅限兩千多位國民大會代表
B. 政黨輪替，除了第十至第十一屆總統，所有總統當選人都來自國民黨
C. 多黨政治，從第四屆至第八屆總統選舉，總統候選人皆只有一位，皆來自國民黨
D. 無稽之談，這種偏頗教科書文字一看就知道是執政者自慰文
E. 以上皆是

靈感來源-音地臉書-
https://www.facebook.com/IndieDaaDee/photos/a.705959122818997.1073741827.705014679580108/880456252035949/?type=1&theater

2. ...1989年（民國78年）中共以武力鎮壓「天安門事件」，更強化國際輿論對我國的同情。在陳水扁（1950~）總統執政期間（2000~2008），採取「割喉外交」策略，導致國際關係一度緊張。2008年馬英九（1950~）總統上任以來，實施「活路外交」政策，積極增加參與國際組織的機會，拓展我國獲得免簽證待遇的國家數，以提升國際地位與能見度。

　請選出文中所指最有可能的＂同情＂行為：
A. 聯合國歡迎中華民國以台灣之名入聯
B. 美國終於通過中華民國F16採購案

　請選出陳水扁「割喉外交」之舉：
A. 2002年以「台澎金馬個別關稅領域」，成為WTO（世貿組織）第144個會員
B. 於2003、2004，與2007年三度申請加入世界衛生組織
C. 尚無美國綠卡

　請問前總統蔣經國先生＂退出聯合國＂之舉最可能屬於：
A. 割喉外交
B. 活路外交

靈感來源-自由時報-
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1398945

二、加分題：

1. 蔣經國的夫人原籍哪一國？
提示：Фаина Ипатьевна Вахрева

靈感來源
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiang_Fang-liang

2. 依照最近教育部長吳思華以「課本已印」回應反課綱學生訴求的邏輯，推測長期使用該教材之好學生＂鈔乾爽＂夾大腸麵線時發現有塊屎的反應會如何？

靈感來源
http://udn.com/news/story/8413/1092647

3. 從中華民國歷任總統中選出最有可能有3P經驗的會是哪一位？

提示為A：1911年，...成為A之側室，A在日本時，與B是結拜好友。B有一日本護士女友C，C與A、B二人均「過從甚密」，C為B生下一子，便過繼給A...。

靈感來源
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%94%A3%E4%B8%AD%E6%AD%A3

嚴重偏頗的歷史教科書 -臉書感想轉貼- History Book of Serious Prejudice -shared from my fb post-

A simple quiz that anyone with no knowledge to Taiwanese politics could answer by just reading the Chinese paragraph below(Here's my Eng translation just in case if you're not familiar with Chinese):
就算對台灣政治毫無概念的人也能因閱讀底下文字猜出底下問題之正解:

In 2012, KMT candidates, Ying-Jeou Ma for the president and Den-Yih Wu for the vice president, defeated candidates from DPP and PFP, and won the 13th Presidential Election of Taiwan. The whole process during this election was much more rational than any other presidential elections before. It meant that the democracy in Taiwan had matured more.
2012年（民國101年）初，舉行第十三任總統、副總統大選，國民黨馬英九、吳敦義（1948年～）擊退民進黨、親民黨的候選人，順利當選，選舉過程較之前的總統大選理性，台灣民主政治更臻成熟。

The question is "Which Party would be most likely to produce a history textbook like this?"
問題是：＂這本歷史教科書最有可能是哪一個黨撰寫的？＂

1. KMT　國民黨
2. DPP　民進黨
3. PFP　親民黨

Welcome to share the quiz
歡迎分享此題

另外, 我看了覺得也很驚人的是莫名其妙的"1948~", 台灣總統選舉第一屆是1948沒錯, 但前八屆選舉有六屆總統候選人只有一名, 一直到第九屆總統全都是同個黨(國民黨)... 這難道是國民黨自嘲的方法嗎? 的確, 若看回前八屆, 能夠人民直選這件事的確是比較理性... 原來我誤會教科書了
BTW, what is also surprising is the random "(1948~)" in the paragraph. I googled it and found out that 1948 was the year of our first presidential election of Taiwan. In 6 of the first 8 elections, there was only one presidential candidate provided from KMT. The first 9 elected presidents were all from KMT. Is KMT being sarcastic to its own past? Now that I looked back, it is indeed more rational that all Taiwanese citizens are able to vote directly for their candidates(Only the 2500+ congress members could vote for the presidents before the 9th presidential election of Taiwan).

感謝銘謀胸解答: 1948為吳的出生年
My appreciation to the Ming-Mou's answer: VP Wu was born in 1948.

我體驗過的教育-臉書感想轉貼-

It saddens me to read the news about a Taiwanese student protester who committed suicide this morning. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/…/student-prote…/2018860.html
看到曾抗議課綱微調的台灣學生今早自殺的新聞讓我難過
(新聞連結歡迎自由轉錄 我的感想也歡迎轉錄 只不過可能要自行複製貼上 要不然不會顯示在轉錄文章上)

Whether he wanted to become a martyr on his birthday or he just couldn't take it anymore due to unbearable depression, I was "impressed" by the immediate presumption, "His suicidal decision should have nothing to do with the protest", released by the chief of the Education Department (of New Taipei City Government) right after his death.
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/…/20150730/658460/
無論他是想在生日當烈士 或因無法承受的低潮而輕生 教育部準次長立馬發表"應與反課綱無關"的推論與邏輯 著實讓我嘖嘖稱奇

Is there anything wrong in our educational system? Please allow me to share some personal experience,
我們的教育系統到底有沒有問題呢? 請容我分享個人經驗:

1. After PRC(the government in China) had ruled the mainland China for over 50 years, my history and geography textbooks still taught us that mainland China belongs to ROC(the government in Taiwan). I only learned that Mongolia was not part of China after a conversation with a Chinese student during a visit in the mainland in 99.
在中華人民共和國與中華民國分別統治中國本土與台灣島半世紀後 我的歷史與地理課本仍然強辯我國領土包含中國大陸. 第一次認識蒙古獨立 是於1999年訪大陸時受對岸學生教導才知道的

2. My very first Taiwan-focused(titled) history class came to me as an optional credit when I was in college.
我第一堂以台灣為中心(為標題)的歷史課是大學的選修學分

3. After having access to online information written in a few languages, I finally knew that the ROC didn't quit its position from the UN, and it was actually that the ROC was expelled by the UN.
在會使用不同語言閱讀網路資料後才知道 原來中華民國不是退出聯合國 而是被踢出聯合國

4. Learning it's OK to have "Double Standard". My history book told me how horrible the massacre was during Jun 4th Incident (Tien-An-Men Square) done by PRC, but the same history book did not want to give us details of how ROC came to murder (and kidnap) its own people.
學會容忍並使用"雙重標準" 我的歷史課本提到64天安門事件中國共產黨對於人民的殘酷屠殺 可是同樣的課本卻不願意更深入告訴我們228事件中華民國政府是如何綁架與謀殺人民

Accepting Double Standard is the worst! If there is a problem calling Mandarin (pronunciation) as Chinese (language), there should also be a problem calling the dialect Hō-ló-oē(Minnan or Hokkien) as Taiwanese since there are other non related dialects widely spoken in Taiwan.
雙重標準是最糟糕的! 如果稱曼德林(發音方式)為國語的邏輯有問題 那麼稱福佬話(閩南話或福建話)為台灣話的邏輯也有問題(台灣還有很多人使用其它方言)

I had a feeling that our government, all my teachers, and all the grown ups knew what I learned from school was not always true. We'd tolerated it for so long because of the fear for lives or the fear for failing the school system(Any updated information could turn into more study for exams). For decades, having high scores at school is equal to a bright future.
我總覺得政府 老師們 與所有長輩都知道學校教的不一定是真的 但幾十年來我們無論是貪生怕死 或是對聯考過度依賴(自以為會考試等於爽人生 害怕任何"更新"可能造成讀不完而考試失利) 於是縱容政府或甚至陪著政府一起睜眼說瞎話

For this generation of students who have witnessed that our educated lies and selective memory didn't bring us better lives, of course they would like to try to finally learn the truth?
這世代的學生們見證了我們一直沒以"教育體制的謊言"與"選擇性記憶"作答而換來更好的人生 他們當然會有給"學習真相"機會的想法?

Why not?
為何不好?